Showing posts with label first friday. Show all posts
Showing posts with label first friday. Show all posts

February 7, 2011

Why Can’t a Nonprofit Be More Like a Business?

Business people and funders often say they want nonprofits to act more like a business but then criticize them and withhold funding when they do. At First Friday on January 7, 2011, SDSVP Partners JoAnne Berg and Duane Tromblywere joined by Laurin Pause, Executive Director of Community Resource Center, to discuss this sometimes provocative subject. All three speakers serve on the SDSVP Board of Directors and have extensive experience in both the nonprofit and for-profit worlds.

by Mandy Sherlock

Nonprofit and for-profit businesses are different.

Anyone who has worked in the for-profit world understands that revenues are the measure of success. It’s all about the bottom line. In the nonprofit world, success is measured differently because there’s a disconnect between revenues and service delivery. The service recipient (“client”) is divorced from the revenue source. The funder or donor is not the person getting benefit from the service delivery - it’s the client. For-profits are very customer-centric, focusing on the needs of the customer. So who’s the customer in the nonprofit world? The “customers” are the funders. Nonprofits are serving their clients but at the same time, they must keep the funders happy. Because of this split, there are many unique challenges to running a nonprofit organization.

So how does a nonprofit determine if they are successful? Ultimately it comes down to outcomes. During a recent strategic planning session as an Investee of San Diego Social Venture Partners (SDSVP), Community Resource Center (CRC) asked themselves, “how are we successful based on the different categories of people we serve?” They determined that feeding a chronic homeless person in the breadline would be considered successful. But there are other levels of success too. After a three year process, CRC was able to put three homeless people, who had been on the streets for over 10 years, into safe housing which also provided a huge cost saving to the county. For a victim of domestic violence, CRC provides safe shelter which is the first step of success. The next steps include the woman staying away from the abusive situation, finding a job, getting a home and staying off welfare. This process of service delivery resulting in outcomes takes 2-3 years, where as in the for-profit company, a product can be developed and taken to market within a year. Instead of counting how many clients they serve as an indicator of success (outputs), CRC measures whether their clients move forward and become self-sufficient (outcomes). Success doesn’t have to do with money; it’s all about the client’s end result which is a major difference separating the nonprofit from the for-profit world.

Another difference: A nonprofit could have $750,000 in the bank and be broke. Why? A donor could write a big check, but restrict the funds. So just because there’s money in the bank doesn’t mean they can spend it. Typically donors don’t want to fund general operating support like lights and staff and printing. They want to give toward the program or directly to the people whom the nonprofit is serving. Often, funders have the unrealistic expectation that nonprofits can run their organization on 10 percent overhead. This is not possible because nonprofits are businesses too. Part of acting like a business is investing in infrastructure and staff and program capacity. For example, Community Resource Center needs real estate – buildings – in order to serve their clients and this involves marketing, sales and administration expenses. If a nonprofit organization doesn’t make these kinds of investments, they can’t implement their mission and ultimately they will fail. For this reason, SDSVP funds general operations and doesn’t restrict funds to its Investees.

In 2004, Community Resource Center’s technology system was failing them. Their computers crashed every week. Data was lost and they couldn’t access reports on time. A few years later when CRC became an Investee of SDSVP, their IT insufficiencies were diagnosed and they put together a plan of attack. In the first year, they spend $20,000 on upgrading CRC’s hardware, let go of their IT staff, substituted a service company and started a computer replacement plan…and ultimately saved $25,000! Now, employees are working efficiently, management information is available, and reports are on time. Because of SDSVP, Community Resource Center was able to invest in its internal infrastructure and come up with an innovative solution to produce an effective outcome.

Before joining San Diego Social Venture Partners, many members donated to charities. However, SDSVP transforms people from check writers to effective donors who build capacity and infrastructure in nonprofits. Money donated to nonprofits who work to prevent violence, feed the homeless, transition foster youth is wonderful but effective giving is about investing in organizations that can be a sustainable business and work to fix social problems for good.

October 4, 2010

Q&A with Reality Changers

“We believe that SDSVP's where the power of business meets the passion of giving also defines the students of Reality Changers. These students, despite being low income, inner-city students, mean business and share your passion for giving, despite their humble circumstances and disadvantaged backgrounds.”
Christopher Yanov, Founder and Executive Director, Reality Changers

At First Friday in September, SDSVP Investee, Reality Changers spoke to Partners and guests about their great work in the community and new partnership with SDSVP. Christopher Yanov, Founder and Executive Director of Reality Changers shared how his organization is radically changing the lives of at-risk, inner city high schoolers into first generation college students:

First there's Jesse, a Reality Changers graduate whose family’s annual income was $7,000/year; upon high school graduation, he earned a $215,000 full ride scholarship to Harvard University where he is now starting his second year. We also learned about Arlene who sold flowers on the side of the road until the day she left for Chicago on a $200,000 scholarship to Northwestern University. And then there’s Ashley who grew up in one of San Diego's most dangerous neighborhoods where there has been 10 gang related homicides in the last 5 years; she got a $203,000 scholarship to Duke University. Impressive, right?

Last month, Reality Changers was in the news for a new agreement with San Diego State University - any student who meets the program requirements and makes good grades is guaranteed admission to SDSU. Their next goal...UCSD.

As you can see, Reality Changers is about results…ultimately changing the reality of teenagers in San Diego.

As a follow up to First Friday, we asked Chris some additional questions about working with Social Venture Partners:

How did you hear about SDSVP?

Reality Changers first heard about SDSVP through its success with past investees such as Second Chance and Junior Achievement.

Why did your organization want to work with SDSVP?

Reality Changers is one of the nation's leaders when it comes to running programs for first generation college students. However, as our programs grow, we must learn how to run a multi-million dollar organization takes much different skill sets - and that's why partnering with SDSVP will be so beneficial.

Has the experience so far met your expectations?

SDSVP warned us that we would be overwhelmed with planning meetings, but they have already challenged us to look at our clients and our markets in new ways and we are looking forward to the results that partnering with SDSVP will soon produce.

What areas are we assisting you in and how have we helped you?

SDSVP is not giving us the answers to big-picture and small-picture questions; in fact, they are helping us figure out just what those questions should be. More specifically, SDSVP is helping Reality Changers create a 3-year and 5-year plan that can be functional for the organization on an everyday basis.

What are your expectations for future years of partnership with SDSVP?

Reality Changers hopes that SDSVP will teach us how to reach more markets - from inner-city students to program partners to program funders who want to see more low-income youth become first generation college.

May 4, 2010

Reflections on The Art of Giving

By Cathleen Wolf

Every seat was taken at the March First Friday luncheon when San Diego Social Venture Partners board member Peg Eddy led a panel on The Art of Giving. These bimonthly discussions help the Partners address a shared goal of becoming more effective givers.

More than 30 years ago, Peg Eddy, CFA, and her husband Bob co-founded Creative Capital Management, Inc. They provide business counseling, financial, estate and succession planning and investment advisory services to families and businesses.

Peg opened the discussion with a question. Why do people choose to give their time, talent and money? The reasons for giving are endless. If you want maximum benefit, it’s best to learn all you can from certified financial and legal advisors who can help you make well-informed decisions, and who understand your motivations, goals and passions.

People who give face three challenges. The first is assuring that the charitable organization is well run. The second is distributing your gifts in a planned strategy that leverages your generosity. The third is developing your own philosophy of giving that helps you set your future course. “There is no grade for the art of giving,” Peg says. “The main goal is to give what you truly want to give, and to try to give effectively.”

First up was Dan Gatto, CPA and founding partner of Gatto, Pope & Warwick, LLP. Dan spans 25 years as the group’s senior tax specialist. “Much depends on your goals,” Dan said, “whether to minimize taxes, provide security for your survivors or facilitate the orderly transfer of assets to beneficiaries and charitable trusts.”

Dan highlighted common mistakes that taxpayers make:

- To get a charitable tax deduction, your contributions must be made to qualified 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt nonprofits (such as San Diego Social Venture Partners and all of its Investees).

- Get adequate documentation at the time when the gift is made. A thank you letter is not enough unless it states the gift type and value. Save copies of your checks or receipts.

Dan emphasized how a planned giving strategy can maximize your tax savings each year.

Peg introduced the next panelist by mentioning the importance of seeking sound legal advice when developing a charitable giving vehicle to manage charitable donations on behalf of an organization, a family or individual.

Phillip Sullivan, Esq. is a Partner in the estates and trusts group of Henderson, Caverly, Pum & Charney LLP. A frequent speaker on estate planning topics, Phil is an adjunct professor and lecturer at the California Western and University of San Diego Schools of Law.

Phil began with a familiar joke: “If you want to pay zero taxes, give all your money to charity.” Most people give to help causes that they care about so the world can be a better place, he continued. “Tax deductions are secondary. You don’t want the tax-deduction train to pull your charitable-giving engine.”

The audience laughed as Phil said that lifetime giving is far more rewarding than giving after death. “Through annual giving, you not only get immediate tax benefits, you see the results of how your money is invested.” He suggests that a trust or estate might “give a percentage rather than a dollar amount for assets that may go down in value.” He emphasized that recent tax and estate law changes must be carefully followed.

Phil explained private foundations and donor-advised funds have grown in popularity as well as scrutiny. Attendees discussed the complexities of interfamily gifting and whether to involve family members in making charitable decisions over money they hope might be theirs.

Peg Eddy added, “the situation is different for every family.” There’s a whole toolbox of giving choices today, she continued. “If you choose what’s best for you and your family – and keep it simple – you’re one step ahead.”

SDSVP Board member Steve Ness concluded the panel with personal reflections. He and his wife Pam joined SDSVP a few years ago after he sold his company (San Diego-based Dynamic Instruments, Inc.). Both had 30 years of entrepreneurial expertise but wanted to learn more about nonprofits. “We enjoy teaming up with others and learning how to be good philanthropists together.”

Steve explained, “For Pam and me, giving was an evolutionary process.” In their early marriage, they made annual donations to organizations they liked. “Philanthropy was all about writing a few checks in unstructured ways, because we wanted to.” In their middle years, their giving was “semi-structured” to support their careers or children’s educations. Most giving was driven by personal relationships – an event, a family illness or something with ties to organizations such as a business, church or school.

“Today our giving is more structured,” Steve said. He and Pam want to give the most (time, treasure, talent) to organizations that support their core values. “But how could we pick the right charities and know they would make meaningful change? We joined SDSVP because we knew that similar community-minded people could help us maximize our time and hone our skills at giving. Together we can help nonprofits build their organizations and strengthen their impact.”

Most attendees felt that effective giving involves a desire to know that their contributions, whether in dollars, expertise or both, can make the world better for themselves and for others.

The discussion ended with several comments on related concerns. Some mentioned the importance of involving (or not involving) children and grandchildren in making choices about family giving. Peg concluded the panel by saying, “for most, it boils down to control. With a well-informed plan, you have the satisfaction of knowing your giving is properly managed and aligns with your unique goals and passions. Alan Sorkin added: “As an organization of informed givers, what a substantial difference we can make.”

September 29, 2008

CEO of The Children’s Initiative Speaks to SDSVP at First Friday

By Cathy Yarbrough

  • More and more babies are born with low or very low birth weight in San Diego county (SD).
  • A total of 27% of kindergarten to 5th grade students attended school in SD less than 95% of the time during 2006-07.
  • Child abuse and neglect in SD remains higher than the state average, but the good news is the rate of substantiated reports has been slowly declining.
  • Other good news for SD: in early childcare and education, our area is above the state and national averages, and the rate of domestic violence reports is declining. However, SD remains above the state average.
  • For youth DUI related injuries and deaths, SD has the highest rate in California.

Sandy McBrayer, CEO of The Children’s Initiative, highlighted these and other findings from the 2007 San Diego County Report Card on Children and Families, at a recent SDSVP 1st Friday lunch meeting.

“Every good business uses data,” she said. “What is the data telling us about children?”

It tells us that while community and family indicators are generally improving in SD, there has been a “lack of substantial progress in reducing poverty and mortality,” as stated in the report. “These two broad indicators may point to underlying problems in the health and safety net of our community.”

The report also noted, “While the percent of San Diego County children living in poverty is lower than the state and the nation averages, we are not making substantial progress in reducing the proportion of our children who live in poverty."

Assessing the overall health and well being of SD’s children, youth and families is a new responsibility for the nonprofit Children’s Initiative (CI). SD’s Health and Human Services previously generated these reports.

For its first Report Card, which covered 2007, CI measured the health and well being of children and families through 25 indicators, ranging from prenatal care and breastfeeding initiation to juvenile arrests and childhood mortality.

The Report Card also identified national best practices for prevention and intervention as well as recommendations for action specific to SD.

For example, to increase the number of children who regularly attend school, supportive interventions should be instituted at the student’s fifth absence, and a countywide universal tracking system should be developed, according to the Report Card. It also calls for more family/community engagement through attendance programs and student connections to school through service learning and career academies.

To reduce the number of infants with low birth rate, the Report Card recommends prenatal care programs that expand not only parents’ participation in support groups and “parenting” classes but also programs that provide intensive in-home support and intervention.

To read the entire Report Card: http://www.thechildrensinitiative.org/